William Klein: Artist Profile

William Klein, a name synonymous with a raw, visceral, and often confrontational style of street photography, remains a pivotal figure. He wasn’t interested in the polite, the picturesque, or the perfectly composed. Instead, he embraced the chaotic energy of urban life: the blur, the grain, the awkward angles, and the sheer messiness of the world. His work, particularly his early street photography, crackles with a restless energy, a sense of immediacy that continues to resonate. He wasn’t a detached observer, but an active participant, his camera a weapon, a tool for exploration, and a means of engaging with the world on his own terms. “I was a kind of anti-photographer,” Klein once said, “I was going against all the rules.” This rebellious spirit is evident in every frame. As he later reflected, “I’m an outsider, I guess. I wasn’t part of any movement. I was working alone, following my instinct. I had no real respect for good technique because I didn’t know what it was. I was self-taught, so that stuff didn’t matter to me.”  

Klein’s influences are complex and, perhaps characteristically, somewhat contradictory. He wasn’t formally trained as a photographer. His background was in painting, studying with Fernand Léger in Paris. This artistic foundation undoubtedly shaped his visual approach, giving him a keen sense of composition, even when seemingly abandoning traditional rules. Léger, as Klein recalled, “told us not to worry about galleries and collectors, but to go out onto the city streets and paint murals.” It was while photographing some of his interior murals, “big hard-edged geometrical paintings,” that Klein had an epiphany. “Somebody turned one of the panels when I was shooting on a long exposure, and when I developed the photographs this already abstract shape was a beautiful blur. That blur was a revelation. I thought, here’s a way of talking about life. Through photography, you can really talk about what you see around you. That’s what I’ve been doing ever since.” One can see echoes of the bold lines and dynamic forms of Léger's work in Klein’s own compositions, albeit translated into the language of photography. However, Klein’s real education came from the streets, from the raw energy of New York City in the 1950s. He cites Weegee, the tabloid photographer known for his gritty depictions of crime scenes and urban life, as a key inspiration. “Weegee showed me that photography could be tough,” Klein said. But Klein’s work goes beyond Weegee’s sensationalism. He adds a layer of social commentary, a sense of irony, and a distinctly modern aesthetic.  


What sets Klein apart is his unflinching gaze, his willingness to confront the viewer with the raw reality of urban existence. His photographs are often confrontational, sometimes even aggressive. They capture the chaos, the noise, the sheer overwhelmingness of city life. In his iconic series “Life is Good & Good for You in New York,” the city becomes a stage for a kind of urban theatre, populated by characters who are both ordinary and extraordinary. The images are often close-up, sometimes blurred, capturing fleeting moments of interaction, expressions of joy, despair, and everything in between. “I wanted to show the city as I saw it,” Klein explained, “not as it should be.” This desire to capture the unvarnished truth, to embrace the imperfections and contradictions of urban life, is what makes his work so powerful. He wasn’t interested in creating a sanitised version of reality, but rather a visceral and immediate experience of the city. As he put it, “People said, ‘What a put-down — New York is not like that. New York is a million things, and you just see the seamy side.’” His view of New York, as he confessed, was that it was “like a big shithouse.”

Klein’s work evolved over the course of his career, moving beyond the raw immediacy of his early street photography. He ventured into fashion photography, bringing his distinctive style to the pages of Vogue. Even in this commercial context, he retained his rebellious spirit, pushing the boundaries of the genre. His fashion photographs are often dynamic, energetic, and sometimes even humorous, a far cry from the static and posed images that were typical at the time. He used wide-angle lenses, unusual perspectives, and blurred motion, creating a sense of immediacy and excitement. As Dorothy McGowan, a Vogue model who worked with Klein, recalled, “People were terrified of him, as though it was the lion’s den.” Klein himself acknowledged, “They were probably the most unpopular fashion photographs Vogue ever published.” This willingness to experiment and to challenge conventions is a hallmark of Klein’s work, regardless of the subject matter. He even made a film about the fashion world, “Who Are You, Polly Maggoo?”, which, as he recalled, “was completely foreign to the whole movie scene here in France.” Later, he made documentaries on figures like Muhammad Ali and Little Richard, drawn, as he said, to “great characters.”

His books are as important to his oeuvre as his individual photographs. “Life is Good & Good for You in New York,” published in 1956, is considered a landmark in the history of photobooks. Its raw energy, its unconventional layout, and its unflinching portrayal of urban life made it a radical departure from the prevailing aesthetic of the time. The book itself becomes a kind of extension of Klein’s photographic practice, a dynamic and immersive experience for the viewer. Other notable books include “Tokyo” (1964) and “Moscow” (1964), both of which capture the unique character of these cities through Klein’s distinctive lens. These books are not simply collections of photographs; they are visual essays, capturing the spirit and energy of a place. As he described his approach to his books, “The sequencing of the New York book, and even the composition of individual images, also seems to owe something to comic-books.” His first book, however, met with resistance. “They just didn’t get it,” he said of the initial reaction to “Life is Good & Good for You in New York.” “They thought it should not have been published, that it was vulgar and somehow sinned against the great sacred tradition of the photography book. They were annoyed for sure.”  


Klein’s exhibitions have also played a significant role in shaping his reputation. His work has been shown in major museums and galleries around the world. One particularly important exhibition was his retrospective at the International Center of Photography in New York in 1996. This exhibition brought together a wide range of his work, from his early street photography to his fashion work and his films, providing a comprehensive overview of his career. It highlighted the diversity of his practice and his consistent willingness to challenge conventions. Even in his exhibitions, Klein sought to create a dynamic and engaging experience for the viewer, reflecting the energy and immediacy of his photography. More recently, a joint retrospective with Japanese photographer Daido Moriyama at Tate Modern explored the similarities in their depictions of New York and Tokyo. Klein, however, remained characteristically nonchalant about the exhibition. “I think it’s kind of stupid,” he said, shrugging, “but a lot of things happen without me really being involved. There’s a connection all right, but…”

Klein’s work sits squarely within the tradition of street photography, but it also transcends it. He shares with photographers like Henri Cartier-Bresson a fascination with the decisive moment, but his approach is radically different. While Cartier-Bresson sought to capture the perfect composition, the harmonious balance of form and content, Klein embraced the chaos and the unpredictability of the street. His work is more akin to that of Robert Frank, whose book “The Americans” also challenged the conventions of the time, but Klein’s work has a distinct energy, a sense of urgency that is all his own. “I’m not a documentarian,” Klein has said. “I’m an artist. I’m interested in my own vision of the world.”

Klein’s influence can be seen in the work of many photographers who followed. His bold use of composition, his willingness to embrace the imperfections of the medium, and his unflinching portrayal of urban life have all had a lasting impact. While it's difficult to pinpoint specific individuals, his influence is more pervasive, a kind of spirit of rebellion that encourages photographers to break the rules, to challenge conventions, and to find their own unique voice. He showed that photography could be more than just a record of reality; it could be a powerful means of expression, a way to engage with the world on a personal and visceral level.

William Klein’s legacy is one of innovation, experimentation, and a relentless pursuit of his own vision. He wasn’t afraid to challenge the established norms of photography, to push the boundaries of the medium, and to capture the world as he saw it, in all its messy, chaotic, and often beautiful complexity. His work continues to inspire and provoke, reminding us that photography can be a powerful tool for exploring the world around us and for engaging with the human experience in all its richness and diversity. He showed us that the streets can be a gallery and that life itself is the greatest subject of all. As Orson Welles said of Klein’s film “Broadway by Light,” “the first film I've seen in which colour was absolutely necessary.” This sense of innovation and pushing boundaries is a hallmark of Klein’s entire oeuvre, from his early street photography to his fashion work and his films.

Rut Blees Luxemburg: Artist Profile

Rut Blees Luxemburg (born 1967) delves into the urban underbelly, the forgotten corners, the liminal zones where the city breathes, sighs, and sometimes, whimpers. Hers is a photography of unease, a visual interrogation of the spaces we often choose to ignore, the architectures of alienation that define so much of modern life. Luxemburg’s work, it can be argued, is less about the seen and more about the felt. It’s about the residue of human presence, the unspoken narratives etched into concrete and steel.

"I'm interested in the city as a psychological space," Luxemburg has said, a statement that resonates throughout her oeuvre. It's not just bricks and mortar, but the anxieties, the dreams, the sheer weight of human experience that she seeks to capture. This, it can be argued, is the crux of her work. It's not simply documentary, though it certainly engages with the fabric of the city. It's not purely aesthetic, though her images possess a stark, often unsettling beauty. It's something more profound, a kind of urban psychoanalysis rendered in the language of light and shadow.

Luxemburg’s work exists in a dialogue with the history of photography, though she rarely makes explicit references. One can detect echoes of Atget's melancholic flânerie, his documentation of a disappearing Paris. There's also a hint of the New Topographics' detached gaze, their focus on the banal and the overlooked. But Luxemburg transcends mere documentation. She infuses her landscapes with a palpable sense of atmosphere, a feeling of something lurking just beneath the surface. "The city is a palimpsest," she has explained, "a layered text where the past is always present, even if it's invisible." And it's this invisible past, this spectral presence, that she makes visible.

Her influences, it is suspected, are not solely photographic. One can sense a kinship with the urban chroniclers of literature, the writers who have explored the darker recesses of city life. Think of Baudelaire's flâneur, adrift in the labyrinthine streets of Paris, or the alienated protagonists of Kafka's novels. Luxemburg’s images, like these literary counterparts, are filled with a sense of displacement, a feeling of being lost in the crowd, even when utterly alone.

What, then, is the significance of Luxemburg's work? It lies, it is believed, in its unflinching portrayal of the contemporary urban condition. She doesn't shy away from the ugliness, the decay, the sheer indifference of the modern city. Instead, she confronts it head-on, forcing us to look at the spaces we'd rather ignore. Her photographs are often unsettling, even disturbing, but they are also profoundly moving. They remind us of our shared humanity, our vulnerability in the face of the urban behemoth.

"I'm not trying to romanticise the city," she has insisted. "I'm trying to understand it." And this understanding, it is argued, is what makes her work so compelling. It's not about judgment, but about observation, about bearing witness to the complexities of urban life.

Luxemburg's work has evolved over time, both stylistically and thematically. Her early photographs, often in stark black and white, possessed a raw, almost brutal quality. They focused on the fringes of the city, the industrial estates, the abandoned buildings, the spaces where the city's discards gather. Later, she began to incorporate colour, not as a decorative element, but as another layer of meaning. The colours are often muted, desaturated, adding to the overall sense of unease.

"Colour is another form of light," she has explained. "It's not just about what you see, but how you see it." And Luxemburg sees the city in a way that few others do. She sees the poetry in the mundane, the beauty in the broken.

Her use of long exposures is also crucial. It blurs the lines between reality and dream, creating images that are both familiar and strange. The city becomes a stage for a kind of urban ballet, where time itself seems to slow down, allowing us to see the subtle movements, the fleeting interactions that make up the fabric of urban life.

Luxemburg's books are not merely collections of images; they are carefully constructed narratives, each telling a different story about the city. Amnesia (1997) felt like a dispatch from the urban unconscious, a collection of images that haunted the viewer long after the book was closed. Liebeslied (2001) was a more intimate exploration of urban desire, the longing for connection in a city of strangers. Phantom Estates (2004), perhaps her most politically charged work, documented the rise of luxury housing developments in London, exposing the social inequalities that underpin so much of urban development. "These buildings," she said of the Phantom Estates, "are not just houses. They are symbols of a new kind of city, a city where the rich get richer and the poor get poorer."

Her exhibitions, too, are carefully curated experiences. They are not simply displays of individual photographs, but immersive environments that invite the viewer to enter into Luxemburg's urban world.

Luxemburg's work occupies a unique space in the history of photography. She is not a documentarian in the traditional sense, nor is she simply an artist using photography as a medium. She is something more, a visual poet of the urban landscape. Her work resonates with the tradition of urban exploration, from the flâneurs of 19th-century Paris to the Situationists of the 20th century. But Luxemburg's vision is distinctly her own. She sees the city with a critical eye, but also with a sense of empathy.

"I'm not trying to judge the city," she has said. "I'm trying to understand it, to feel its pulse, to hear its whispers." And it's these whispers, these subtle clues to the city's inner life, that she captures so brilliantly in her photographs.

It's difficult to quantify the influence of an artist, but it is suspected that Luxemburg's work will continue to resonate with photographers and artists for generations to come. Her unflinching portrayal of the urban landscape, her ability to find beauty in the mundane, her exploration of the psychological dimensions of city life – these are all qualities that will continue to inspire and challenge.

"The city is always changing," she has said. "And I'm always trying to keep up." And it's this restless curiosity, this desire to explore the ever-evolving urban landscape, that defines Rut Blees Luxemburg's enduring legacy. Her photographs are not just images; they are invitations to look more closely, to see more deeply, to feel the pulse of the city in all its complexity and contradiction. They are, in short, a vital contribution to our understanding of the urban world.

Paul Graham: Artist Profile

Paul Graham (born 1956) stands as a pivotal figure in contemporary photography, renowned for his quietly subversive approach to documenting the everyday. His work, often characterised by its understated beauty and subtle social commentary, has redefined the landscape of British and international photography, influencing generations of artists. This article explores Graham's career, tracing his influences, examining the significance of his work, and assessing his lasting legacy.

Born in Wolverhampton, England, in 1956, Paul Graham's initial engagement with photography was through the lens of social documentary. He was deeply influenced by the British documentary tradition, particularly the work of photographers like Tony Ray-Jones and Martin Parr, whose images captured the nuances of British social life with a blend of humour and critical observation. However, Graham's approach differed from his predecessors. While they often focused on the overtly "interesting" or "unusual," Graham found significance in the mundane, the overlooked corners of everyday existence. He was also influenced by the New Topographics movement in American photography, which emphasised a detached, objective approach to landscape, albeit one that often revealed subtle human interventions within the environment. This influence can be seen in Graham's early work, which displays a similar attention to the seemingly insignificant details of the built environment. "I was interested in the unregarded," Graham explained. "The things that are normally passed by, the things that are so obvious they are overlooked." This focus on the overlooked became a hallmark of Graham's work.

Early Work and the Shift to Colour

Graham's early work, culminating in his first book A1 - The Great North Road (1983), already hinted at his departure from conventional documentary practice. This series, documenting the length of the A1 road, presented a fragmented and often banal view of England. Far from the romanticised imagery of the countryside or the stark realities of industrial decline, Graham's photographs focused on the in-between spaces, the roadside cafes, the petrol stations, the fleeting encounters that make up the fabric of contemporary life. The book itself became a key element of his practice. Graham's use of the photobook as an artistic medium, not just a repository for images, allowed him to control the narrative and create a more immersive experience for the viewer. The sequencing of images, the pacing, and the overall design of the book all contributed to the meaning of the work.

Off Licence (1984), his second book, solidified his reputation as a photographer with a unique vision. The series, shot in and around off-licences (liquor stores) in working-class areas, offered a subtle commentary on social and economic realities without resorting to didacticism. The images, often characterised by their muted colours and seemingly detached perspective, allow the viewer to draw their own conclusions about the scenes depicted. "I wanted to make work that was more ambiguous, more open to interpretation," Graham stated. "I didn't want to tell people what to think." This ambiguity became a crucial element of his photographic language. He presented the reality of these spaces without judgment, allowing the viewer to consider the social and cultural context themselves.

The publication of Beyond Caring (1986) marked a turning point in Graham's career and in British photography in general. This series, documenting the lives of people in a Birmingham welfare office, was groundbreaking in its use of colour. At a time when black and white was still considered the dominant medium for serious documentary work, Graham's use of colour was both bold and innovative. He employed a restrained palette, capturing the drabness and mundanity of the welfare office without resorting to sensationalism. The photographs, often depicting individuals waiting, filling out forms, or simply staring into space, offered a poignant glimpse into the lives of those on the margins of society. "Colour was the reality of the situation," Graham explained. "Black and white would have been a stylisation." This pragmatic approach to colour, focusing on its descriptive potential rather than its aesthetic qualities, further distinguished Graham's work from conventional documentary photography. The series sparked considerable debate, with some critics accusing Graham of exploiting the subjects of his photographs. However, others praised its unflinching portrayal of social reality and its innovative use of colour. The series brought Graham international recognition and established him as a leading figure in contemporary photography. It also opened up new possibilities for the use of colour in documentary photography.

Shifting Focus, Later Work, and Photographic Language

In the 1990s, Graham's work began to move away from the explicitly social themes of his earlier projects. While still concerned with the everyday, his focus shifted towards a more contemplative exploration of time, space, and perception. Empty Heaven (1995), for example, marked a significant departure. Shot in Japan, the series features images of Shinto shrines and urban landscapes, often characterised by their serene beauty and subtle sense of unease. "I was trying to capture a feeling, an atmosphere," Graham said of this work. "It was less about documenting a specific place and more about exploring the way we see the world." This marked a shift from the social landscape to a more personal and introspective exploration of place and experience. The images in Empty Heaven are more atmospheric and suggestive than his earlier work, inviting the viewer to contemplate the spiritual dimensions of the everyday.

American Night (1998-2002) further solidified this shift. This ambitious project, spanning several years and locations across the United States, explored the complexities of American identity through a series of fragmented and often enigmatic images. The series, characterised by its use of multiple exposures, blurring, and other experimental techniques, challenged conventional notions of photographic representation. "I wanted to create a more subjective, more poetic way of looking at the world," Graham explained. "I was interested in the way memory and perception shape our experience of reality." This work moved beyond the specific social context of his earlier projects to explore broader themes of identity, perception, and the nature of reality itself. The use of experimental techniques in American Night reflects Graham's desire to move beyond the limitations of traditional photographic representation and to create a more nuanced and subjective portrait of America.

a shimmer of possibility (2007) saw Graham return to a more observational style, though still infused with the poetic sensibility of his later work. This series, shot in various locations, captures fleeting moments of everyday life with a sense of quiet wonder. The images, often characterised by their subtle use of light and colour, evoke a feeling of ephemerality and the potential for beauty in the most unexpected places. The title itself suggests the ephemeral nature of these moments and the possibility of finding beauty in the ordinary.

The Present (2012) continued this exploration of the everyday, focusing on the rhythms and patterns of urban life. The series, shot in New York City, captures the city's energy and diversity through a series of fragmented and layered images. The photographs, often depicting multiple scenes within a single frame, create a sense of simultaneity and the interconnectedness of urban experience. The Present reflects the fragmented and multi-layered nature of contemporary urban life, capturing the sense of constant movement and change.

Throughout his career, Graham has developed a distinct photographic language, characterised by several key strategies. His use of colour, as discussed earlier, is both deliberate and understated. He avoids the dramatic hues and saturated tones often associated with colour photography, instead opting for a more muted palette that reflects the everydayness of his subjects. His compositions are often seemingly casual, even haphazard, but they are carefully constructed to create a sense of balance and harmony. He frequently employs techniques such as blurring, multiple exposures, and shallow depth of field to create a sense of ambiguity and to challenge the viewer's expectations. His use of these techniques is not simply aesthetic; they serve to disrupt conventional ways of seeing and to encourage the viewer to look more closely at the world around them. These techniques also reflect Graham's interest in exploring the subjective nature of perception and the way in which memory and experience shape our understanding of reality.

Graham’s Influence:

Paul Graham's influence on contemporary photography is undeniable. His work has paved the way for a new generation of photographers who are exploring the complexities of the everyday with a similar sensitivity and subtlety. His emphasis on ambiguity, his innovative use of colour, and his willingness to challenge conventional notions of photographic representation have all had a profound impact on the field. Photographers like Richard Billingham (though stylistically very different), and Alec Soth, while developing their own distinct voices, owe a debt to Graham's pioneering work. His influence can also be seen in the increasing number of photographers who are working with colour in a thoughtful and nuanced way, and who are exploring the potential of the photobook as an artistic medium. Graham's work has also helped to broaden the definition of what constitutes "documentary" photography, moving beyond the traditional focus on social issues to encompass more personal and poetic explorations of the everyday.

Graham's work has also had a significant impact on the art world more broadly. His photographs have been exhibited in major museums and galleries around the world, and he has been the recipient of numerous awards and accolades. His work has helped to elevate photography to the status of fine art, demonstrating its capacity to engage with complex social, political, and philosophical issues. He has challenged the traditional boundaries of the medium and expanded its possibilities.

Key Exhibitions and Books:

  • A1 - The Great North Road (1983)

  • Off Licence (1984)

  • Beyond Caring (1986)

  • Empty Heaven (1995)

  • American Night (1998-2002)

  • a shimmer of possibility (2007)

  • The Present (2012)

  • Does Photography Have a Future? (2010) - A significant exhibition and publication exploring the changing landscape of photography.

Quotes on Graham's work:

  • "Graham's photographs are not simply documents of social reality; they are also meditations on the nature of seeing itself." – Gerry Badger, photography critic.

  • "Paul Graham has changed the way we see the world. He has shown us the beauty and significance of the everyday, the overlooked, the mundane." – Charlotte Cotton, photography curator.

Paul Graham's own words:

  • "I'm interested in the space between things, the in-between moments. That's where I think the real stories lie."

  • "Photography is not about capturing the world as it is, but about creating a dialogue with it."

  • "I want my photographs to be open to interpretation. I don't want to tell people what to think. I want them to engage with the work and draw their own conclusions."

Legacy:

Paul Graham's legacy lies not only in his own remarkable body of work but also in the influence he has exerted on subsequent generations of photographers. He has demonstrated the power of photography to explore the complexities of the everyday, to challenge conventional ways of seeing, and to engage with profound social and philosophical questions. His work has helped to redefine the landscape of contemporary photography, pushing the boundaries of the medium and expanding its possibilities. He has shown that the ordinary can be extraordinary, that the mundane can be meaningful, and that the overlooked can be profoundly significant. His quiet revolution in photographic vision continues to resonate, shaping the way we see the world around us. His work encourages us to look more closely, to question our assumptions, and to find beauty in the everyday. He has left a lasting mark on the world of photography, and his influence will continue to be felt for many years to come.