William Klein: Artist Profile

William Klein, a name synonymous with a raw, visceral, and often confrontational style of street photography, remains a pivotal figure. He wasn’t interested in the polite, the picturesque, or the perfectly composed. Instead, he embraced the chaotic energy of urban life: the blur, the grain, the awkward angles, and the sheer messiness of the world. His work, particularly his early street photography, crackles with a restless energy, a sense of immediacy that continues to resonate. He wasn’t a detached observer, but an active participant, his camera a weapon, a tool for exploration, and a means of engaging with the world on his own terms. “I was a kind of anti-photographer,” Klein once said, “I was going against all the rules.” This rebellious spirit is evident in every frame. As he later reflected, “I’m an outsider, I guess. I wasn’t part of any movement. I was working alone, following my instinct. I had no real respect for good technique because I didn’t know what it was. I was self-taught, so that stuff didn’t matter to me.”  

Klein’s influences are complex and, perhaps characteristically, somewhat contradictory. He wasn’t formally trained as a photographer. His background was in painting, studying with Fernand Léger in Paris. This artistic foundation undoubtedly shaped his visual approach, giving him a keen sense of composition, even when seemingly abandoning traditional rules. Léger, as Klein recalled, “told us not to worry about galleries and collectors, but to go out onto the city streets and paint murals.” It was while photographing some of his interior murals, “big hard-edged geometrical paintings,” that Klein had an epiphany. “Somebody turned one of the panels when I was shooting on a long exposure, and when I developed the photographs this already abstract shape was a beautiful blur. That blur was a revelation. I thought, here’s a way of talking about life. Through photography, you can really talk about what you see around you. That’s what I’ve been doing ever since.” One can see echoes of the bold lines and dynamic forms of Léger's work in Klein’s own compositions, albeit translated into the language of photography. However, Klein’s real education came from the streets, from the raw energy of New York City in the 1950s. He cites Weegee, the tabloid photographer known for his gritty depictions of crime scenes and urban life, as a key inspiration. “Weegee showed me that photography could be tough,” Klein said. But Klein’s work goes beyond Weegee’s sensationalism. He adds a layer of social commentary, a sense of irony, and a distinctly modern aesthetic.  


What sets Klein apart is his unflinching gaze, his willingness to confront the viewer with the raw reality of urban existence. His photographs are often confrontational, sometimes even aggressive. They capture the chaos, the noise, the sheer overwhelmingness of city life. In his iconic series “Life is Good & Good for You in New York,” the city becomes a stage for a kind of urban theatre, populated by characters who are both ordinary and extraordinary. The images are often close-up, sometimes blurred, capturing fleeting moments of interaction, expressions of joy, despair, and everything in between. “I wanted to show the city as I saw it,” Klein explained, “not as it should be.” This desire to capture the unvarnished truth, to embrace the imperfections and contradictions of urban life, is what makes his work so powerful. He wasn’t interested in creating a sanitised version of reality, but rather a visceral and immediate experience of the city. As he put it, “People said, ‘What a put-down — New York is not like that. New York is a million things, and you just see the seamy side.’” His view of New York, as he confessed, was that it was “like a big shithouse.”

Klein’s work evolved over the course of his career, moving beyond the raw immediacy of his early street photography. He ventured into fashion photography, bringing his distinctive style to the pages of Vogue. Even in this commercial context, he retained his rebellious spirit, pushing the boundaries of the genre. His fashion photographs are often dynamic, energetic, and sometimes even humorous, a far cry from the static and posed images that were typical at the time. He used wide-angle lenses, unusual perspectives, and blurred motion, creating a sense of immediacy and excitement. As Dorothy McGowan, a Vogue model who worked with Klein, recalled, “People were terrified of him, as though it was the lion’s den.” Klein himself acknowledged, “They were probably the most unpopular fashion photographs Vogue ever published.” This willingness to experiment and to challenge conventions is a hallmark of Klein’s work, regardless of the subject matter. He even made a film about the fashion world, “Who Are You, Polly Maggoo?”, which, as he recalled, “was completely foreign to the whole movie scene here in France.” Later, he made documentaries on figures like Muhammad Ali and Little Richard, drawn, as he said, to “great characters.”

His books are as important to his oeuvre as his individual photographs. “Life is Good & Good for You in New York,” published in 1956, is considered a landmark in the history of photobooks. Its raw energy, its unconventional layout, and its unflinching portrayal of urban life made it a radical departure from the prevailing aesthetic of the time. The book itself becomes a kind of extension of Klein’s photographic practice, a dynamic and immersive experience for the viewer. Other notable books include “Tokyo” (1964) and “Moscow” (1964), both of which capture the unique character of these cities through Klein’s distinctive lens. These books are not simply collections of photographs; they are visual essays, capturing the spirit and energy of a place. As he described his approach to his books, “The sequencing of the New York book, and even the composition of individual images, also seems to owe something to comic-books.” His first book, however, met with resistance. “They just didn’t get it,” he said of the initial reaction to “Life is Good & Good for You in New York.” “They thought it should not have been published, that it was vulgar and somehow sinned against the great sacred tradition of the photography book. They were annoyed for sure.”  


Klein’s exhibitions have also played a significant role in shaping his reputation. His work has been shown in major museums and galleries around the world. One particularly important exhibition was his retrospective at the International Center of Photography in New York in 1996. This exhibition brought together a wide range of his work, from his early street photography to his fashion work and his films, providing a comprehensive overview of his career. It highlighted the diversity of his practice and his consistent willingness to challenge conventions. Even in his exhibitions, Klein sought to create a dynamic and engaging experience for the viewer, reflecting the energy and immediacy of his photography. More recently, a joint retrospective with Japanese photographer Daido Moriyama at Tate Modern explored the similarities in their depictions of New York and Tokyo. Klein, however, remained characteristically nonchalant about the exhibition. “I think it’s kind of stupid,” he said, shrugging, “but a lot of things happen without me really being involved. There’s a connection all right, but…”

Klein’s work sits squarely within the tradition of street photography, but it also transcends it. He shares with photographers like Henri Cartier-Bresson a fascination with the decisive moment, but his approach is radically different. While Cartier-Bresson sought to capture the perfect composition, the harmonious balance of form and content, Klein embraced the chaos and the unpredictability of the street. His work is more akin to that of Robert Frank, whose book “The Americans” also challenged the conventions of the time, but Klein’s work has a distinct energy, a sense of urgency that is all his own. “I’m not a documentarian,” Klein has said. “I’m an artist. I’m interested in my own vision of the world.”

Klein’s influence can be seen in the work of many photographers who followed. His bold use of composition, his willingness to embrace the imperfections of the medium, and his unflinching portrayal of urban life have all had a lasting impact. While it's difficult to pinpoint specific individuals, his influence is more pervasive, a kind of spirit of rebellion that encourages photographers to break the rules, to challenge conventions, and to find their own unique voice. He showed that photography could be more than just a record of reality; it could be a powerful means of expression, a way to engage with the world on a personal and visceral level.

William Klein’s legacy is one of innovation, experimentation, and a relentless pursuit of his own vision. He wasn’t afraid to challenge the established norms of photography, to push the boundaries of the medium, and to capture the world as he saw it, in all its messy, chaotic, and often beautiful complexity. His work continues to inspire and provoke, reminding us that photography can be a powerful tool for exploring the world around us and for engaging with the human experience in all its richness and diversity. He showed us that the streets can be a gallery and that life itself is the greatest subject of all. As Orson Welles said of Klein’s film “Broadway by Light,” “the first film I've seen in which colour was absolutely necessary.” This sense of innovation and pushing boundaries is a hallmark of Klein’s entire oeuvre, from his early street photography to his fashion work and his films.

Nadav Kander: Artist Profile

Nadav Kander (born 1961) is a London-based photographer, artist and director, known for his portraiture and landscapes. Kander’s photographs are often described as quiet, monumental, and imbued with a sense of unease. They are landscapes, portraits, and still lifes, but rarely straightforwardly so. A Kander image is less a record of a thing seen and more an exploration of the psychological space between the viewer and the subject, between the present and an imagined future. He photographs the vast and the minute, the industrial and the natural, the powerful and the vulnerable, finding in each a similar thread of human fragility and the precariousness of our place in the world. Kander’s work is less about the decisive moment and more about the lingering aftermath, the quiet before the storm, or the slow erosion of time. A sense of quietude and introspection permeates all his work, from his vast landscapes to his intimate portraits, connecting these seemingly disparate genres. As Kander himself has stated, “I’m looking to be moved by the image and I hope for the viewer to recognize something of themselves in the image too.”

Kander has cited a diverse range of influences, from the stark landscapes of the American West photographers like Carleton Watkins and Timothy O’Sullivan, to the painterly atmospheres of early pictorialists. He has spoken of the impact of the Bechers’ typologies of industrial structures, not for their detached objectivity, but for the inherent human presence that resonated in their stark depictions of functional architecture. One senses, too, the influence of photographers like Edward Weston, whose close-ups of natural forms revealed an almost abstract beauty, and the quiet intensity of Irving Penn’s portraits. “I’m interested in the space between things,” Kander has said, “not just the thing itself.” This interest in the interstitial, the in-between, is evident in his landscapes, which often feature liminal spaces – shorelines, riverbanks, the edges of cities – places where human activity and the natural world collide and intertwine. This fascination with the “space between things” extends to his portraiture, where he seeks to capture not just a likeness but the unspoken stories and emotions that reside within his subjects.

The importance of Kander’s work lies in its ability to evoke a sense of unease and wonder in equal measure. He photographs the detritus of industrial progress – abandoned factories, decaying machinery, polluted landscapes – not with a sense of moralising condemnation, but with a quiet acknowledgement of the human cost of progress. His images of the Namibian desert, for example, are not simply beautiful landscapes; they are also a reminder of the vastness of time and the insignificance of human endeavour in the face of geological forces. In his series "Dust," which documents the remnants of Soviet-era military installations in Kazakhstan, the crumbling concrete structures become monuments to a failed ideology, their decay a poignant reminder of the transience of power. “I’m drawn to things that are on the edge of disappearing,” Kander has explained, “things that are holding on, but only just.” This sense of impending loss, of a world in flux, is a recurring motif in his work, imbuing even his most serene landscapes with a subtle tension.

Over the course of his career, Kander’s work has evolved, but his core concerns have remained constant. He has continued to explore the relationship between humanity and the environment, the fragility of human existence, and the passage of time. His early work was often characterised by a stark, almost minimalist aesthetic. As his career has progressed, his images have become more layered and complex, incorporating a greater sense of narrative and emotional depth. His series "Yangtze, The Long River," which documented the rapid industrialisation of China, marked a turning point in his career. The series was not simply a record of environmental destruction; it was also a meditation on the human cost of progress and the loss of cultural heritage. “The Yangtze project was a huge undertaking,” Kander has said, “it changed the way I thought about photography.” This project, which saw him travel the length of the Yangtze River over three years, solidified his reputation as a photographer capable of tackling complex and globally relevant themes.

Kander’s portraiture too is compelling, and it forms a significant part of his oeuvre. Spanning 30 years and encompassing a diverse range of subjects, from world leaders to ordinary individuals, his portraits reveal a remarkable sensitivity to the human condition. As evidenced in The Meeting, a recent volume dedicated to his portraiture, Kander’s lens captures the essence of his subjects, revealing their vulnerabilities, their strengths, and their place in the world. He has photographed Barack Obama, Sir David Attenborough, David Lynch, Desmond Tutu, Thom Yorke, and even his own mother, finding the common thread of human experience that connects them all. His portraits are not about capturing a likeness, but about revealing something of the subject’s inner life, their character, their anxieties, their place in the world. He often uses a shallow depth of field, blurring the background and focusing attention; notable too, is his use of coloured lighting, his subjects often bathed in a cinematographic blue/green haze spotted with warm notes of amber or pink or isolated from plain backgrounds by the corona-like halo of a ring flash. These techniques always drawing the viewer into a more intimate encounter with the individual portrayed, emphasizing their presence and suggesting a degree of psychological isolation. It’s not just about the face, though; sometimes a hand gesture, the way a person holds their body, or the space around them becomes just as important as the features themselves.

Kander’s portraits often possess a stillness, an intensity that invites contemplation. He captures moments of introspection, of weariness, of quiet strength. There’s a sense of something unsaid in many of his portraits, a story hinted at but not fully revealed. He avoids the posed, the performative, seeking instead the unguarded moment, the flicker of emotion that betrays the carefully constructed facade. In his portrait of Barack Obama, for example, the then-Senator is shown in a moment of quiet contemplation, his gaze averted from the camera. The image is not about power or status, but about the weight of responsibility and the solitude of leadership. It’s a portrait that humanizes a figure often seen as larger than life, revealing a moment of quiet vulnerability. This vulnerability is not weakness, but a recognition of the burdens carried and the decisions faced. This ability to find the human within the powerful is a hallmark of Kander’s portraiture.

Kander brings the same level of attention and insight to his portraits of ordinary individuals, finding the extraordinary in the everyday. The Meeting includes portraits of Walthamstow market traders, capturing the character and resilience of these individuals within their working environment. These portraits, like those of the famous, possess a quiet dignity, a respect for the individual and their experiences. They remind us of the shared humanity that connects us all, regardless of status or background. In these images, the individual becomes representative of something larger, a microcosm of the human condition. Kander’s own history informs his approach to portraiture. Having grown up in South Africa, his series of portraits of children in colonial school uniform, taken in 1991, are particularly poignant. As he reflects on one of these portraits, Schoolgirl (white photographer), he acknowledges the complex dynamics of the encounter, recognizing in the child’s gaze not mistrust, as he initially perceived, but disgust. This self-awareness, this willingness to confront his own biases and preconceptions, is what gives his portraits their depth and resonance. “A portrait is not about what someone looks like,” Kander has said, “it’s about who they are.” It's about the stories they carry, the experiences that have shaped them, the emotions that flicker across their faces.

Kander’s books are an integral part of his artistic practice, his first, Pentimento, published in 2000, was a retrospective of his early work, showcasing his diverse range of subjects and styles. Yangtze, The Long River, published in 2007, was a landmark publication that brought him international acclaim. Dust, published in 2011, continued his exploration of the relationship between humanity and the environment. Bodies. Still Life, published in 2016, explored the human form in a series of intimate and often unsettling images. The Meeting, his 2019 portrait collection, adds another important chapter to his body of work. “A book is a different experience than seeing a photograph on a wall,” Kander has said. “It’s a more intimate and immersive experience.”

Kander’s work fits into the history of photography in a number of ways. He is part of a tradition of landscape photography that stretches back to the 19th century, but his approach is distinctly contemporary. He is not simply documenting the world around him; he is interpreting it, imbuing it with his own vision. His work also engages with the history of portraiture, but he moves beyond the simple capturing of a likeness to explore the inner lives of his subjects. Kander's work shares some concerns with the New Topographics movement of the 1970s, which focused on the altered landscape, though his work possesses a greater degree of emotional resonance than the often detached work of those photographers. He is also part of a lineage of portrait photographers who seek to capture more than just an outward appearance, delving into the psychological depths of their subjects. "I'm not interested in just documenting reality," Kander has said. "I'm interested in exploring the underlying emotions and anxieties that shape our experience of the world." This exploration of the emotional landscape, both internal and external, is what sets his work apart.

Kander’s approach to landscape photography, his use of portraiture, and his interest in the relationship between humanity and the environment have all resonated with a new generation of artists. His work has also helped to broaden the definition of what photography can be, moving beyond the purely documentary to embrace a more poetic and expressive approach. His success in both the commercial and artistic realms, shooting covers for influential publications while simultaneously pursuing his personal projects, also provides a valuable model for aspiring photographers. As he notes, “I don’t think one gets ‘discovered’—rather, it happens for those individuals who fight to have their work seen.” His own career trajectory, marked by dedication, self-reflection, and a constant striving to refine his craft, serves as an inspiration to those navigating the often-challenging world of photography.

Kander has created a body of work that is both beautiful and thought-provoking, challenging us to consider our place in the world and the impact of our actions. His images are not simply records of the present; they are also glimpses into the future, warnings about the fragility of our planet and the precariousness of human existence. He asks us to consider not only what we see, but also what we don't, the spaces between the things, the emotions that flicker across a face, the stories whispered by a landscape. “I hope that my work can make people think,” Kander has said. “I hope that it can make them question the world around them.” His photographs are not easy or comfortable. They ask us to confront difficult truths about ourselves and our world. Yet, it is in this confrontation that the power of Kander’s work lies. It is a power that will continue to resonate for generations to come, prompting reflection, inspiring dialogue, and reminding us of the shared humanity that binds us all. His ability to bridge the gap between commercial and artistic photography, his dedication to mentoring young photographers, and his unwavering commitment to exploring the complex relationship between humanity and the environment all contribute to a legacy that extends beyond the individual image, shaping the future of the medium itself. He reminds us that photography is not just about capturing a moment, but about engaging with the world, questioning our place within it, and striving to understand the human condition in all its complexity and beauty.

"We are all on this earth for a very short time," Kander has reflected. "Photography is a way of trying to make sense of that." This sense of time, both fleeting and monumental, is a constant presence in his work, reminding us of our own place within the larger narrative of existence.