Alec Soth: Artist Profile

Alec Soth, a photographer of quietude and a chronicler of the American grain, doesn't shout; he whispers. His large-format portraits and landscapes, often focused on the country's overlooked margins, possess a stillness that's less about the absence of noise and more about the presence of something deeply felt. He's not interested in the spectacular, but in the subtle poetry of the everyday, the hushed moments that reveal, almost inadvertently, the human condition. Think of him as a contemporary Walker Evans, but one who trades Evans's stark social commentary for a kind of melancholic tenderness. He photographs the vernacular, not as a detached observer, but as someone attuned to the quiet hum of existence. Soth, who has cited Diane Arbus as an influence, travels the backroads of America, collecting images like a wandering poet gathering verses. His journey along the Mississippi, documented in the self-published Sleeping by the Mississippi (2004), brought him to wider attention, with one of its images, "Charles," even gracing the poster for the 2004 Whitney Biennial.

Soth's work has drawn comparisons to Walker Evans and Stephen Shore, and he has shot for publications like The New York Times Magazine, Fortune, and Newsweek. But his approach is far from purely editorial. He's spoken of the nervousness he feels when photographing people, suggesting that his own awkwardness becomes part of the exchange, a kind of shared vulnerability. This vulnerability translates into an intimacy in his portraits, a sense of connection between photographer and subject. His process is deliberate, almost methodical. He’s described travelling with notes taped to his steering wheel, lists of image ideas – beards, birdwatchers, after the rain, figures from behind, and so on – a kind of visual haiku in progress. He asks permission, waits for his subjects to become comfortable, often working with an 8x10 camera. He seeks a “narrative arc and true storytelling,” a sense that each image flows into the next.

His work has continued to evolve since Sleeping by the Mississippi. Niagara (2006), for example, explored themes of love and desire, including a series of portraits of newlyweds arranged through a Niagara Falls wedding chapel. Last Days of W, a more politically charged project, reflected a nation exhausted by the Bush presidency. Between 2006 and 2010, Soth, under the pseudonym Lester B. Morrison, worked on Broken Manual, a kind of underground guide for those seeking escape. This project saw him exploring the retreats of monks, survivalists, hermits, and runaways, a journey into the fringes of society. Concurrently, he produced From Here to There: Alec Soth's America, a broader survey of his work. His practice is marked by these distinct projects, each a chapter in an ongoing exploration of the American landscape and its inhabitants.

Niagara by Alec Soth. Photo: Thomas Hawk

Sleeping by the Mississippi, with its elegant design and thoughtful sequencing, serves as a prime example. His exhibitions, too, are immersive experiences, large-scale prints inviting contemplation. One remembers the hushed reverence of his gallery installations, the way the images command a space. His 2016 exhibition, Hypnagogia, explored the liminal state between waking and sleeping, a further exploration of interior landscapes. Even a seemingly straightforward assignment, such as a laughter yoga workshop in India for The New York Times Magazine, led to a year-long break from commercial work and a renewed focus on personal projects. A subsequent art residency saw him collaborating with the then 97-year-old choreographer Anna Halprin.

Soth’s work sits squarely within the tradition of American documentary photography, but it transcends the genre. His images are not simply documents; they are imbued with poetry and a sense of human connection. They resonate with the work of photographers like Robert Frank, whose subjective approach to documenting America also sought to unearth something deeper about the nation's character. As Philip Brookman has noted, Soth’s photographs are “both intimate and epic, personal and universal.” They capture the quiet grandeur of the everyday, the beauty in the mundane.

Soth has encouraged a new generation of photographers to slow down, to embrace the deliberate nature of large-format photography, to seek out the quiet corners of the world, and to connect with their subjects on a more profound level. While it’s difficult to pinpoint specific artists directly influenced by him, one can certainly detect a broader trend towards a more contemplative and personal approach to documentary work – a trend in which Soth has played a significant role. His founding of the publishing house Little Brown Mushroom (LBM) further underscores his commitment to fostering a particular kind of photographic storytelling. Through LBM, he publishes his own work and that of other like-minded photographers, creating “narrative photography books that function in a similar way to children’s books.” His collaborations with writers like Brad Zellar also highlight his interest in the interplay between image and text.

Soth's legacy is still being written, but his contribution to photography is already substantial. He has reminded us of the power of the still image to capture the complexities of human experience, to tell stories that resonate across cultures and time. He has shown us that the extraordinary can be found in the ordinary, if we only take the time to look. "I think photography is about paying attention to the world," Soth has said. "It’s about seeing what’s there and trying to understand it." This, perhaps, is the key to his work: a deep and abiding curiosity about the world and a commitment to seeing it, not as it should be, but as it is. His photographs, with their quiet beauty and profound empathy, will continue to challenge and inspire for years to come.

Diane Arbus: Artist Profile

Diane Arbus’s photographs are not for the faint of heart. They are unsettling, often disturbing, yet undeniably compelling. They are portraits of the marginalised, the eccentric, the “freaks” as they were often labelled, but also of the seemingly ordinary – the suburban housewife, the child in its Sunday best. Arbus’s lens doesn't simply record; it probes, it questions, it forces us to confront our own preconceptions about normality and otherness. Her work, one could argue, is a kind of visual anthropology of the American condition, a sometimes brutal, sometimes tender, but always unflinching examination of the human psyche. As Susan Sontag wrote, “Arbus’s photographs are… about the secret life of America.” They are, to my mind, less about the what and more about the why – why we look, why we categorise, why we recoil or connect with the figures in her frames. As Arbus herself said, “I don’t press the shutter. The image does, and it’s like being gently clobbered.” It's a powerful description of her process, the sense of being overtaken by the image itself.

Arbus’s influences are complex and not always easily discernible. She studied with Berenice Abbott, Alexey Brodovitch, and Lisette Model, formative experiences that undoubtedly shaped her approach to photography. She encountered the works of Mathew Brady, Paul Strand, and Eugène Atget early on, visits made with her then-husband, Allan Arbus. These early encounters undoubtedly shaped her understanding of photography’s potential. While she admired the work of Weegee, the tabloid photographer known for his graphic images of crime scenes and urban life, her approach was fundamentally different. Weegee’s photographs are often sensational, focused on the dramatic moment. Arbus, on the other hand, was interested in the quieter, more subtle aspects of human experience. She sought to capture the inner lives of her subjects, their vulnerabilities, their anxieties, their hidden selves. “A photograph is a secret about a secret,” Arbus once said. “The more it tells you the less you know.” This sense of mystery, this feeling of something unsaid, is a hallmark of her work.

Her early work, including her commercial work with her husband, honed her technical skills and her eye for composition, but it was her personal work, her exploration of the city and its inhabitants, that truly defined her. She photographed circus performers, transvestites, and other individuals who lived on the fringes of society. These early images, while already displaying her distinctive style, are often more straightforwardly descriptive. Later, her work became more introspective, more focused on the psychological dimensions of her subjects. She began to use a Rolleiflex camera, which allowed her to get closer to her subjects and to capture their expressions with greater intimacy. This shift in technique coincided with a deepening of her artistic vision. She moved beyond simply documenting the “other” and began to explore the ways in which we all perform our identities, the masks we wear to navigate the world. “I really believe there are things nobody would see if I didn't photograph them,” she asserted. It's not just about the subject, but the relationship between photographer and subject, the implicit contract of looking. As she further noted, “For me the subject of the picture is always more important than the picture. And more complicated.”

Arbus’s photographs are not always comfortable to look at. They can be disturbing, even shocking. But they are also deeply human. They remind us of our own vulnerabilities, our own anxieties, our own sense of being different. She had a knack for capturing the awkwardness, the fragility, the sheer strangeness of human existence. “I’m always interested in people who represent themselves in a certain way,” she explained. “It’s like a mask that they put on. It’s a way of dealing with the world.” And it is these masks, these carefully constructed personas, that Arbus’s camera penetrates, revealing the humanity beneath.

Her inclusion in the Museum of Modern Art’s “New Documents” exhibition in 1967, alongside Garry Winogrand and Lee Friedlander, marked a turning point in her career, though her work was already evolving in this direction. This exhibition, which highlighted a new generation of photographers who were challenging traditional notions of documentary photography, placed Arbus’s work in a broader context and helped to solidify her reputation as a significant artist. Her two Guggenheim Fellowships in the 1960s also provided crucial support for her work.

Her 1972 retrospective at the Museum of Modern Art in New York, a year after her death by suicide, cemented her place in the history of photography. It was a controversial exhibition, with some critics accusing her of exploitation and voyeurism. But it was also a hugely influential exhibition, introducing her work to a wider audience and sparking a debate about the nature of photography and its relationship to reality. Her work was also shown at the Venice Biennale, a rare honour for a photographer. Since then, numerous exhibitions, including major retrospectives like “Diane Arbus Revelations” and “in the beginning,” have further explored and contextualised her work, revealing the depth and breadth of her artistic vision.

Arbus’s book, Diane Arbus: An Aperture Monograph, published posthumously, has become a classic of photographic literature. It features many of her most iconic images, accompanied by her own writings and reflections on her work. The book offers a glimpse into her creative process, her motivations, and her unique way of seeing the world. The acquisition of her complete archive by the Metropolitan Museum of Art in 2007 has ensured that her work will continue to be studied and appreciated for generations to come. The ongoing publication of books and catalogues, such as Diane Arbus Documents, further demonstrates the continuing fascination with her work and its evolving interpretation.

Arbus’s work fits into a broader context of 20th-century art that explored the themes of alienation, identity, and the human condition. Her photographs share a certain kinship with the work of artists like Edward Hopper, whose paintings depict the isolation and loneliness of modern life. They also resonate with the work of photographers like Robert Frank, whose book The Americans offered a similarly unflinching portrait of American society. “My favourite thing is to go where I’ve never been,” Arbus declared. And it is this spirit of exploration, this willingness to venture into the unknown, that defines her art.

Arbus’s influence on subsequent generations of photographers is undeniable. Her work has paved the way for a more subjective and personal approach to photography, one that embraces the complexities and contradictions of human experience. Photographers like Nan Goldin, Sally Mann, and Joel-Peter Witkin, each in their own way, owe a debt to Arbus’s pioneering vision.

Diane Arbus’s legacy is complex and multifaceted. She is remembered as a photographer who dared to look where others wouldn't, who challenged our notions of beauty and normality, and who revealed the hidden truths of the human heart. Her photographs continue to fascinate, to disturb, and to inspire. They are a testament to the power of photography to illuminate the darkest corners of the human psyche and to remind us of our shared humanity, even in our most vulnerable and imperfect moments. As Janet Malcolm wrote, "Arbus's photographs are not about freaks. They are about us." And it is this unflinching self-portrait, this unflinching look at ourselves through the lens of Diane Arbus, that constitutes her enduring legacy.

Rineke Dijkstra: Artist Profile

Rineke Dijkstra (born 1959) is a renowned Dutch photographer known for her insightful and often poignant portraits. Her work explores themes of identity, adolescence, and the human condition, capturing the nuances of individual experience with a quiet intensity.  

Key Themes and Approaches:

  • The Human Condition: Dijkstra's work delves deeply into the complexities of human existence. She focuses on moments of transition and self-discovery, often capturing young people at pivotal junctures in their lives. Her subjects range from teenagers on beaches to young soldiers, ballet dancers, and individuals from diverse social and cultural backgrounds.  

  • The Power of the Gaze: Dijkstra's portraits are characterized by a direct and often intense gaze between the subject and the viewer. This direct engagement creates a powerful sense of intimacy and invites viewers to contemplate the inner lives of her subjects.  

  • The Passage of Time: Many of Dijkstra's series, such as "Beach Portraits" and "I.C.A. London," involve revisiting subjects years later, documenting their physical and psychological transformations over time. This emphasis on the passage of time adds a profound layer of meaning to her work, highlighting the fleeting nature of youth and the enduring power of memory.  

  • The Influence of Documentary: While her work is deeply personal and artistic, Dijkstra draws inspiration from documentary photography. She often photographs her subjects in their natural environments, capturing candid moments and authentic expressions.

Major Works and Exhibitions:

  • Beach Portraits (1992-1999): This seminal series features portraits of teenagers on beaches around the world. Dijkstra captures their awkward grace and the fleeting nature of youth with a combination of empathy and detachment.  

  • I.C.A. London (1994-1999): This series documents young people attending an art school in London, capturing their individuality and exploring themes of identity and self-expression.

  • Israeli Portraits (2000-2002): This series focuses on young Israelis, both male and female, before and after their mandatory military service. It explores themes of national identity, social responsibility, and the impact of war on young people.

  • The Buzz Club (1996-1997): This series captures young people at a popular nightclub in Liverpool, England, exploring themes of youth culture, identity, and the fleeting nature of youth.  

  • Almerisa (1994): A poignant series of portraits of a young Bosnian refugee, documenting her journey from war-torn Bosnia to a new life in the Netherlands.

Influences and Connections:

  • August Sander: Dijkstra's interest in documenting the human condition and her focus on the individual within society echoes the work of August Sander, a pioneer of portrait photography in the 20th century.

  • Diane Arbus: Dijkstra's unflinching gaze and her ability to capture the essence of her subjects share similarities with the work of Diane Arbus, who was known for her portraits of marginalized and unconventional individuals.  

Legacy and Impact:

Rineke Dijkstra's work has had a profound impact on contemporary photography. Her innovative approach to portraiture, her sensitive and insightful observations of the human condition, and her commitment to long-term projects have inspired countless artists.  

Key Takeaways from Dijkstra's Approach:

  • The Importance of Observation: Dijkstra's work emphasizes the importance of careful observation and a deep understanding of her subjects. She spends time with them, building rapport and allowing their personalities to emerge.

  • The Power of Long-Term Projects: Many of Dijkstra's most significant projects involve returning to the same subjects over time, allowing her to document their growth and transformation. This long-term approach adds depth and complexity to her work.

  • The Ethical Considerations of Portraiture: Dijkstra's work raises important ethical questions about the representation of individuals and the power dynamics inherent in the photographic process. She approaches her subjects with respect and sensitivity, striving to capture their essence without exploitation.

Rineke Dijkstra's work continues to resonate with audiences worldwide. Her insightful and moving portraits offer a profound reflection on the human condition, reminding us of our shared humanity and the complexities of individual experience.