Bernd and Hilla Becher : Artist Profile

Bernd and Hilla Becher, a collaborative force in the world of photography, embarked on a project that redefined the very notion of photographic representation. Their work, a meticulous and dispassionate cataloguing of industrial structures, transformed the way we perceive both the landscape and the camera's capacity to document it. They were not, perhaps, artists in the conventional sense, but rather chroniclers, driven by an almost scientific impulse to classify and preserve a disappearing world. Their black and white images, devoid of dramatic lighting or sentimental framing, presented blast furnaces, water towers, grain elevators, and other functional structures with an austere beauty that resonated far beyond the realms of documentary photography.  


The Bechers' project began in the late 1950s, a time when photography was moving beyond the pictorialism that had dominated its early years. They were influenced, perhaps, by the New Objectivity movement in German art of the 1920s, which championed a realistic and unidealised representation of the world. One might also detect echoes of August Sander's ambitious project to document the German people through portraiture, though the Bechers' focus was on the industrial landscape rather than the human face. They sought, as they often stated, to create an objective record, a typology of industrial forms. “We don’t have any message,” Bernd Becher once said. “We are only interested in the object.” This seemingly simple statement belies the profound impact of their work.  


What is important about the Bechers' work lies precisely in this self-imposed limitation. By stripping away subjective interpretation and focusing on the pure form of their subjects, they revealed the inherent beauty and complexity of these often-overlooked structures. They presented these industrial behemoths not as symbols of progress or pollution, but as objects worthy of attention in their own right. Their photographs, often presented in grids of similar structures, emphasised the variations within a type, revealing the subtle design choices and functional adaptations that shaped each individual building. This typological approach, reminiscent of scientific classification, allowed viewers to see the underlying logic and evolution of industrial architecture. “We wanted to make the object speak,” Hilla Becher explained. “We didn’t want to add anything.”  


The Bechers' work evolved over the course of their career, though their fundamental approach remained consistent. They refined their technique, achieving a remarkable clarity and depth of field in their images. They also expanded their geographical scope, documenting industrial structures not just in Germany, but also in other parts of Europe and North America. Their early work focused primarily on the heavy industry of the Ruhr Valley, the heartland of German industrial production. Later, they turned their attention to other types of structures, such as water towers and grain elevators, broadening their survey of the industrial landscape. While their subject matter expanded, their photographic style remained remarkably consistent, a testament to their unwavering commitment to their chosen method.  


The Bechers published a number of influential books throughout their career, each one a meticulously crafted collection of their photographs. Anonymous Sculpture (1970) was an early and important work, showcasing their typological approach to industrial structures. Other significant publications include Blast Furnaces (1971), Water Towers (1988), and Grain Elevators (1997). These books, with their stark black and white images and minimal text, became essential references for architects, artists, and anyone interested in the built environment. Their exhibitions, too, were significant events, often featuring large grids of photographs that transformed the gallery space into a kind of industrial museum. One recalls the austere beauty of their installations, the sheer number of images creating a powerful cumulative effect.  


The Bechers' work occupies a unique place in the history of photography and art. It challenged the traditional notions of artistic expression, blurring the lines between documentary photography and fine art. Their influence can be seen in the work of many contemporary photographers, particularly those who explore the relationship between landscape, architecture, and industrialisation. Their work also resonated with artists working in other media, influencing conceptual art and minimalism. One might argue that their detached, objective approach paved the way for a new kind of photographic practice, one that prioritised concept and documentation over subjective expression. As the art critic and curator Douglas Fogle noted, "The Bechers’ photographs are not simply documents of industrial structures; they are also meditations on the nature of representation itself."  

The Bechers' influence is vast and continues to grow. They have inspired generations of photographers to look at the world with fresh eyes, to see the beauty in the mundane and the significance in the seemingly insignificant. Their students at the Düsseldorf Art Academy, including photographers such as Andreas Gursky, Thomas Struth, and Candida Höfer, have gone on to become major figures in contemporary photography, each developing their own distinct style while sharing a common interest in the objective representation of the world. While not explicitly acknowledging the Bechers as an influence, one can see a certain kinship in the work of these artists, a shared commitment to clarity, precision, and the exploration of the contemporary landscape.  


The Bechers' legacy lies in their profound impact on the way we perceive the world around us. They taught us to see the beauty and complexity in the industrial landscape, to appreciate the ingenuity and functionality of the structures that shape our lives. Their work is a testament to the power of photography to document, to classify, and to reveal the hidden order of things. They transformed the way we think about photography, moving it beyond the realm of personal expression and into the realm of objective observation. "They are not artists in the traditional sense," wrote the critic and curator Jeff Wall, "but their work is art, of a very high order." This assessment captures the essence of the Bechers' contribution, their ability to transcend the conventional categories of art and photography and create a body of work that is both aesthetically compelling and historically significant. Their photographs, with their stark beauty and unwavering focus, stand as a powerful reminder of the industrial age and its enduring impact on the world we inhabit.

The Dusseldorf School: A Legacy of Objectivity and the Sublime

The Dusseldorf School, a constellation of photographers who emerged from the Kunstakademie Düsseldorf in the 1970s and 1980s, has left an indelible mark on the history of photography. Characterized by a cool, objective, and often monumental style, their work challenged the prevailing trends of the time and redefined the boundaries of the medium. This essay will explore the origins, key figures, artistic influences, and enduring legacy of this influential movement.  

Origins and Influences:

The Dusseldorf School's roots lie in the tumultuous socio-political climate of the 1960s and 70s. The Vietnam War, the Cold War, and the rise of consumerism had shaken faith in traditional values and societal structures. This period witnessed a growing disillusionment with the subjective and expressive tendencies of Abstract Expressionism and Pop Art.  

Within this context, the Kunstakademie Düsseldorf, under the guidance of Bernd and Hilla Becher, fostered an environment of rigorous intellectual inquiry and a critical examination of photographic practice. The Bechers, known for their meticulous documentation of industrial structures, instilled in their students a profound respect for objectivity and a commitment to rigorous observation. They encouraged a detached, almost scientific approach to photography, emphasizing formal concerns, precise composition, and the careful selection of subject matter.  

Key Figures and Their Approaches:

The Bechers' influence extended beyond their own work. Their students, including Andreas Gursky, Thomas Ruff, Thomas Struth, Candida Höfer, and Axel Hütte, each developed distinctive styles while sharing a common ground in their approach to photography.  

  • Andreas Gursky: Gursky is renowned for his large-scale photographs of landscapes, architecture, and globalized economies. He often employs a wide-angle lens and a high vantage point to capture vast and overwhelming scenes, emphasizing the interconnectedness of human activity and the scale of our impact on the environment. His work, characterized by a cool, almost clinical aesthetic, challenges our perception of reality and invites contemplation on the complexities of the modern world.  

  • Thomas Ruff: Ruff explores the nature of representation through his series of portraits, still lifes, and architectural studies. He employs a highly controlled and standardized approach, often using a large-format camera and a consistent lighting setup. His portraits, for example, present his subjects with a neutral expression against a plain background, stripping away individuality and emphasizing the inherent strangeness of the human face. Ruff's work raises questions about identity, perception, and the constructed nature of reality.  

  • Thomas Struth: Struth is known for his large-format photographs of museums, theaters, and public spaces. He captures these environments with a meticulous attention to detail, inviting viewers to contemplate the history, culture, and social dynamics embedded within these spaces. His photographs often convey a sense of awe and wonder, drawing attention to the sublime aspects of human creation and the passage of time.  

  • Candida Höfer: Höfer focuses on the interiors of public spaces, such as libraries, theaters, and museums. Her photographs, often shot in low light, create a sense of mystery and intrigue. The absence of human figures in her images emphasizes the architectural forms and the institutional power structures that shape our experiences.

  • Axel Hütte: Hütte's work explores the relationship between nature and civilization. He often photographs landscapes, forests, and urban environments, capturing the subtle interplay of light and shadow and the delicate balance between human intervention and natural processes. His images evoke a sense of tranquility and contemplation, inviting viewers to connect with the natural world.  

Influence on Contemporary Photography:

The Dusseldorf School's influence on contemporary photography is profound and multifaceted. Their emphasis on objectivity, formal rigor, and the exploration of fundamental photographic concerns has had a significant impact on subsequent generations of artists.  

  • The Rise of Conceptual Photography: The Dusseldorf School's focus on conceptual ideas and the critical examination of photographic practice paved the way for the rise of conceptual photography. Artists began to use photography as a tool for investigation, exploring themes of identity, memory, and the nature of representation.  

  • The Return to Naturalism: The Dusseldorf photographers, with their emphasis on natural light and a more straightforward approach to image-making, helped to counter the prevailing trends of heavily manipulated and artificially lit imagery. This led to a renewed interest in documentary photography and a focus on the inherent truthfulness of the image.  

  • The Subjective Turn: While the Dusseldorf School emphasized objectivity, it also inadvertently paved the way for a more subjective and personal approach to photography. Artists began to explore their own experiences, memories, and emotions through the lens, drawing inspiration from the Dusseldorf School's rigorous approach to composition and image-making while infusing their work with personal meaning.

Legacy and Future Directions:

The Dusseldorf School's legacy extends far beyond the work of its founding members. Their influence can be seen in the work of countless contemporary photographers, from the large-scale landscapes of Edward Burtynsky to the conceptual explorations of Roni Horn.  

The School's emphasis on critical inquiry and a rigorous examination of photographic practice remains highly relevant today. As technology continues to evolve and the boundaries of the medium continue to expand, the Dusseldorf School's legacy serves as a reminder of the importance of thoughtful observation, careful composition, and a commitment to exploring the fundamental questions that photography raises about our world and ourselves.

In art history, the Dusseldorf School will be remembered as a pivotal moment in the evolution of photography. They challenged the prevailing trends of their time, redefined the boundaries of the medium, and left a lasting impact on generations of artists. Their work continues to inspire and challenge viewers, prompting us to question our assumptions about reality and to engage with the world around us in new and profound ways.  

Conclusion:

The Dusseldorf School's emphasis on objectivity, formal rigor, and the exploration of fundamental photographic concerns has shaped the course of the medium. While their approach may seem austere to some, it has provided a crucial foundation for subsequent generations of artists to build upon, leading to a rich and diverse range of photographic expression. The Dusseldorf School's legacy serves as a testament to the power of rigorous inquiry, careful observation, and a commitment to pushing the boundaries of artistic expression.